<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictions for Mac OS 10.4 Tiger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/</link>
	<description>Business • Technology • Society • Environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 21:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 13:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>How come no one mentions a true 64bit OS?

Surely Speech activation must be coming to 10.4.

Also Speech Recognition seems one of those functions typically to benefit from 64bit computing.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come no one mentions a true 64bit OS?</p>
<p>Surely Speech activation must be coming to 10.4.</p>
<p>Also Speech Recognition seems one of those functions typically to benefit from 64bit computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I agree on new applications for iLife.  My guess is that if Apple gets into a consumer device for entertainment at home there may be a corollary application that relates to or suppliments it&#039;s features.

Updating of the file system with database features is much anticipated.  I hope you can relate it to web resources as well.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on new applications for iLife.  My guess is that if Apple gets into a consumer device for entertainment at home there may be a corollary application that relates to or suppliments it&#8217;s features.</p>
<p>Updating of the file system with database features is much anticipated.  I hope you can relate it to web resources as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 04:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s only a matter of time before apple introduces a way to easily share audio, video, photos and text, i for one can&#039;t wait

i agree that there will probably be no new iApp but eventually it&#039;s logical for apple to offer a two way Safari iApp that doesn&#039;t mention blogging but is actually a blog app

iBlog just doesn&#039;t hit that &quot;insanely great due to Steve Jobs is a fanatic about usability&quot; sweet spot



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s only a matter of time before apple introduces a way to easily share audio, video, photos and text, i for one can&#8217;t wait</p>
<p>i agree that there will probably be no new iApp but eventually it&#8217;s logical for apple to offer a two way Safari iApp that doesn&#8217;t mention blogging but is actually a blog app</p>
<p>iBlog just doesn&#8217;t hit that &#8220;insanely great due to Steve Jobs is a fanatic about usability&#8221; sweet spot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 02:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>one minor point...Tog didn&#039;t create...he documented. and that&#039;s from the guy who wrote the Finder ;-)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one minor point&#8230;Tog didn&#8217;t create&#8230;he documented. and that&#8217;s from the guy who wrote the Finder <img src='http://www.troyangrignon.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe any iApps will be unveiled with Tiger at WWDC - it&#039;s a developer&#039;s conference about Tiger, not a consumer launch.

For the same reason (without considering Microsoft) I wouldn&#039;t expect an Apple developed OpenOffice to be launched. Though TextEdit is likely to updated again (last time it got MS Word import/export) as the Cocoa Text APIs are again being expanded.

VNC/Windowing features would be great.

I expect the industry standard messaging and calendaring will come from other orgs eg Lotus and Novell. I can&#039;t believe Apple could have created a whole message/calendar platform in the last 12 mths given they support industry standard protocols like LDAP or AD.

And I definitely don&#039;t won&#039;t Tog back, or the Cmd+N keyboard combo changed (I definitely open new windows more often than creating new folders), and don&#039;t believe junior programmers are responsible for the Aqua interface.

I expect to see file system changes to support the new file identification technology already introduced in 10.3. That is, tech replacing type/creators and file extensions. I&#039;d guess that changes to the HFS+ file system will add support for metadata like this, that as a result file system responsiveness will be improved, and that Apple will introduce some whizz bang UI features for the Finder and other apps like FCP, iPhoto, etc that can benefit from the new file metadata. This will be the first steps to adding features to outdo Longhorn.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe any iApps will be unveiled with Tiger at WWDC &#8211; it&#8217;s a developer&#8217;s conference about Tiger, not a consumer launch.</p>
<p>For the same reason (without considering Microsoft) I wouldn&#8217;t expect an Apple developed OpenOffice to be launched. Though TextEdit is likely to updated again (last time it got MS Word import/export) as the Cocoa Text APIs are again being expanded.</p>
<p>VNC/Windowing features would be great.</p>
<p>I expect the industry standard messaging and calendaring will come from other orgs eg Lotus and Novell. I can&#8217;t believe Apple could have created a whole message/calendar platform in the last 12 mths given they support industry standard protocols like LDAP or AD.</p>
<p>And I definitely don&#8217;t won&#8217;t Tog back, or the Cmd+N keyboard combo changed (I definitely open new windows more often than creating new folders), and don&#8217;t believe junior programmers are responsible for the Aqua interface.</p>
<p>I expect to see file system changes to support the new file identification technology already introduced in 10.3. That is, tech replacing type/creators and file extensions. I&#8217;d guess that changes to the HFS+ file system will add support for metadata like this, that as a result file system responsiveness will be improved, and that Apple will introduce some whizz bang UI features for the Finder and other apps like FCP, iPhoto, etc that can benefit from the new file metadata. This will be the first steps to adding features to outdo Longhorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 21:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>try iHomepage or Safari Home Page. I still use Claris Home Page 2 to create simple web pages for my family CD-ROM. I would love to have something like it but OSX native...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try iHomepage or Safari Home Page. I still use Claris Home Page 2 to create simple web pages for my family CD-ROM. I would love to have something like it but OSX native&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I believe you have indeed identified the main threads of speculation and tentative information which are presently available but there must be some gee-whiz flash-bang technology included for the single user or else I&#039;ll be able to pass up my yearly $129 OS update fee. I wouldn&#039;t mind. Panther works just fine.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you have indeed identified the main threads of speculation and tentative information which are presently available but there must be some gee-whiz flash-bang technology included for the single user or else I&#8217;ll be able to pass up my yearly $129 OS update fee. I wouldn&#8217;t mind. Panther works just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 19:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I agree with your primary point about adapting to the new rather than pining for the old, but I&#039;m also a huge believer in prioritizing command elements such as keystrokes and clicks for most benefit for most users rather than to &quot;teach the user that we have a new function&quot;.

To answer your question, I can&#039; t think of once in the past 24 months of running OS X that I have wanted a new Finder Window. I don&#039;t need a WINDOW, I need a particular folder open, so I open it directly from my dock using the hierarchical folder lists or directly from an icon. However I create new folders all the time. So logically from my perspective, Command-N for new folder makes a lot of sense. Of course, I can change it on my computer but I have watched every one of my clients, (particularly design clients who are always creating new project folders) run into this problem repeatedly. Perhaps in your own usage, you find the opposite in which case, I suppose the current keyboard commands make sense.

My broader point is that there are still UI changes that would make a lot of sense. In fact, it would be great if Apple would bring back Tognazzini  (the interface guru) to do a top to bottom reassessment of the interface to consolidate and standardize the interface elements once again. The entire twenty year body of work was abandoned (thanks Steve) and the junior programmers are committing all sorts of stupid errors in every one of the iApps. Examples of this would be using pop-up lists to change windows (a la Print Center) when a pop-up list should be used to list possible solutions for a single choice. There is an overall lack of consistency and tested UI methodology that is currently running rampant in the junior programmers at Apple that I hope will be addressed at some time in the future. It does not appear to be a big priority at the moment however, so I&#039;m doubtful that it will happen.

And that aside, the whole OS is so stable, that I don&#039;t really even care that much myself!



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your primary point about adapting to the new rather than pining for the old, but I&#8217;m also a huge believer in prioritizing command elements such as keystrokes and clicks for most benefit for most users rather than to &#8220;teach the user that we have a new function&#8221;.</p>
<p>To answer your question, I can&#8217; t think of once in the past 24 months of running OS X that I have wanted a new Finder Window. I don&#8217;t need a WINDOW, I need a particular folder open, so I open it directly from my dock using the hierarchical folder lists or directly from an icon. However I create new folders all the time. So logically from my perspective, Command-N for new folder makes a lot of sense. Of course, I can change it on my computer but I have watched every one of my clients, (particularly design clients who are always creating new project folders) run into this problem repeatedly. Perhaps in your own usage, you find the opposite in which case, I suppose the current keyboard commands make sense.</p>
<p>My broader point is that there are still UI changes that would make a lot of sense. In fact, it would be great if Apple would bring back Tognazzini  (the interface guru) to do a top to bottom reassessment of the interface to consolidate and standardize the interface elements once again. The entire twenty year body of work was abandoned (thanks Steve) and the junior programmers are committing all sorts of stupid errors in every one of the iApps. Examples of this would be using pop-up lists to change windows (a la Print Center) when a pop-up list should be used to list possible solutions for a single choice. There is an overall lack of consistency and tested UI methodology that is currently running rampant in the junior programmers at Apple that I hope will be addressed at some time in the future. It does not appear to be a big priority at the moment however, so I&#8217;m doubtful that it will happen.</p>
<p>And that aside, the whole OS is so stable, that I don&#8217;t really even care that much myself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 19:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>iLife is sort of it&#039;s own product now. I wouldn&#039;t hold your breath waiting for apple to keep bundling freebie iapps with OS X. and besides, what on earth would it be? iSew, iJigsawpuzzle, iCleanyourroomforyou?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iLife is sort of it&#8217;s own product now. I wouldn&#8217;t hold your breath waiting for apple to keep bundling freebie iapps with OS X. and besides, what on earth would it be? iSew, iJigsawpuzzle, iCleanyourroomforyou?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 19:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s wrong with command shift N for new folder? do you really create a new folder more often than opening a finder window, or are you still one of those poeple who double click the hard drive icon ala 1984? I&#039;m not ready to say that OS X is really that much more functional than OS 9, yet, but OS X is a hella of a lot more functional if you use it the way it was intended instead of trying to get it to behave like OS 9.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s wrong with command shift N for new folder? do you really create a new folder more often than opening a finder window, or are you still one of those poeple who double click the hard drive icon ala 1984? I&#8217;m not ready to say that OS X is really that much more functional than OS 9, yet, but OS X is a hella of a lot more functional if you use it the way it was intended instead of trying to get it to behave like OS 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 06:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.troyangrignon.com/2004/05/08/predictions-for-mac-os-104-tiger/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>hmmm these sound good from a business point of view but i bet there will also be something there for consumers, perhaps another iApp?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm these sound good from a business point of view but i bet there will also be something there for consumers, perhaps another iApp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

