My nephew Matt sent me a link to this Wired article on rat neurons being used to control a flight simulator.
In essence, they have plugged the feedback and the control systems into
the neurons and have found that eventually the neurons learn how to
"fly" the virtual plane.
Now, I have heard of using neural networks connected to wings or to legs and then letting them learn how to walk or fly. But I have never heard of using live brain material to achieve the same thing.
It brings to mind (no pun intended) articles I have read on teaching the body to "feel" fake limbs
as well as on retraining sexual stimulation (teaching quadriplegics to
attain orgasm through touch stimulation of their head for example
rather than their genitalia), many of which point to the somewhat
universal nature of neurons and their ability to remap to different
inputs and outputs by simply retraining them purposefully.
The fascinating thing for me about this work is:
• the brain works without a heart (or so it appears unless I read the
article incorrectly) which makes me ask, what is feeding it? Also, it's
interesting to me that all you need is the core material and then it
just works - it does what it is supposed to do, which is receive
inputs, establish communication channels, and drive outputs.
• it is a true bionic hybrid, similar to the guy who sent email via his thoughts recently.
Matt asked me what I thought of the ethics of this work. I don't think
there are any ethical problems with designing and building hybrid
bionic creatures to understand the cognitive systems and signalling
networks.
Although I do admit that the idea of fleshy brain material being inside
this device did give me pause for a moment for some reason that I still
can't articulate.
UPDATE: This Wired article
discusses research at Andrew Schwartz's neurobiology lab at the
University of Pittsburgh that allowed them to train a monkey to learn
how to use a robotic arm simply by sending it brain signals, in
essence, re-mapping some small subset of neurons to the inputs and
outputs of this robotic arm. The monkey could then use the arm to feed
itself. Once again, this seems to point to the brain as being quickly
able to adapt to new limbs, new motor skills, and new sensations or at
least the sensation of sensation.
|
||||||
My view on the interesting things happening at the intersection of business, technology, society, and the environment.Bio Top Articles
Recent Comments
|
Rat neurons used to control a flight simulator, and a monkey brain controls a robotic arm (UPDATE)
Comments
Re: Rat neurons used to control a flight simulator, and a monkey brain controls a robotic arm (UPDATE)
by
Gary Ralston
on Mon 01 Nov 2004 07:23 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
Jeff Hawkins, inventor of the Palm OS, is also fascinated with the study of the neocortex as a hierarchical pattern-matching device. I highly recommend his book: "On Intelligence" (ISBN: 0805074562). What you will find is a brilliant and accessible discussion of the flaws and oversights in current threads of both neuroscience and AI, as well as ground-breaking (and I do not use the phrase lightly) theories that could just point us back on the right path.
|
|||||

My view on the interesting things happening at the intersection of business, technology, society, and the environment.